PLEASE DO BUSINESS WITH THOSE WHO DO BUSINESS WITH US -- OUR ADVERTISERS.

THANK YOU FOR VISITING OUR WEB PORTAL. PLEASE TELL A FRIEND.

YOU can speak out and be heard by having your own "Column" - Visit the "Public Opinion" Section above.

WE ACKNOWLEDGE AND THANK ALL OUR SOURCES FOR THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS IN MAKING US AMERICA'S NUMBER ONE NEWS INFORMATION PORTAL.

ATTENTION TALK SHOW HOSTS: We are honored that many radio talk show hosts use our Web Portal for their "show prep." We would appreciate your occasional mention of our site to your audience. Thanks!

ADVERTISEMENT: If you want to advertise your business or Web Site, send us an email by clicking on "Contact" above. It could be the best business decision you make.

ABC Online Canada National Post Daily Telegraph The Observer Wired News Xinhua News

VOA VIEW -- Is the opinion of "Voice of Americans", which is a private entity not affiliated in any way with the United States government or any of its agencies. The opinions expressed here, in whatever medium or format, are not necessarily the opinions of the ownership or advertisers of this web site - 0415.

     The Supreme Courtsaid it will hear cases challenging states’ bans on semiautomatic “assault weapons” such as the popular AR-15 rifle, putting the issue of gun restrictions firmly before the justices.  Why!

     They agreed to take cases challenging bans in Illinois and Connecticut, though the eventual ruling would likely affect laws in other Democrat-led states as well.  AR-15s and similar guns are the most popular style of rifle sold in America, making it a prominent target for gun control advocates — and a key test of the Second Amendment’s guarantee of a right to bear arms for self-defense.  The justices announced they would hear the cases the same day they released their final opinions for cases argued in their 2025-26 term. The gun cases will be heard in their next term, which starts in October.

     A year ago, the justices rejected a similar case challenging Maryland’s ban on the AR-15.  At that time, Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, a Trump appointee, said the court would have to reckon with the issue soon.  “Although the court today denies certiorari, a denial of certiorari does not mean that the court agrees with a lower-court decision or that the issue is not worthy of review,” he said in a statement. “Additional petitions for certiorari will likely be before this court shortly and, in my view, this court should and presumably will address the AR–15 issue soon, in the next term or two.”

     Tens of millions of AR-15s are in circulation, and they’re legal in most states, which makes the states that do purport to ban them outliers.  AR-15s are semiautomatic rifles, which means each trigger pull fires a round. They are distinct from automatic rifles or machine guns, where the weapon fires for as long as the trigger is pulled and there is ammunition to feed it.  Restrictions on automatic weapons have long been recognized, but semiautomatic weapons are a trickier matter.  Gun-rights advocates said they’re eager for the justices to rule.

“     The Second Amendment protects arms in common use for lawful purposes, and it’s hard to argue that a type of rifle that potentially outnumbers Ford F-150 trucks in America doesn’t meet that standard,” said Adam Kraut, executive director of the Second Amendment Foundation.  Gun-rights supporters say assault weapons bans are based more on the look and feel of a gun than on any material difference in performance.

     Gun control groups, though, argue the AR-15 and similar semiautomatic weapons can deal death at an elevated pace, putting them beyond the protection of the Constitution.  There’s reason to think the justices will disagree.  Under the Supreme Court’s latest rulings, for gun restrictions to survive constitutional scrutiny, they must be the sort of laws that would have been countenanced by the founders.